According to a Harvard Business School study, 76% of turnover can be traced back to poor interviewing practices and bad hiring decisions.

Given enough time and hands-on interviewing experience, most interviewers will eventually learn how to correctly identify high achievers.

According to a recent CareerBuilder survey, two-thirds of American businesses have faced lower productivity and reduced employee morale due to a bad hire.

Most companies track turnover and know exactly how many of their best performing employees are exiting and why.

If an untrained interviewer uses an unstructured interview format (asks questions that pop into their head), the probability of hiring the best applicant is about 40% according to a Michigan State study.

Motivation-based interviewing assesses what 3 components common to all high achievers?

Which statement is true about high achievers (people who achieve above-average results)?

Most unmotivated employees were great hires but they changed after they were hired due to poor management, unrealistic job expectations and/or unsatisfactory working conditions.

If you see signs or hear examples of an applicant taking initiative, it's a reliable indicator the applicant is self-motivated.

What is motivation-based interviewing?